AB731: Bill Text

The bill also authorizes the planning commission of a city or village to modify a TID's boundary by removing territory from the TID if the planning commission determines, in writing, that all of the TID's costs have been or may be paid by tax increments that are generated from the smaller district. The bill also prohibits the use of tax increments for residential development or for retail development, except incidental retail use in part of a facility that is otherwise used for manufacturing purposes, in a Greenfield TID.

All of the changes to current law that are contained in this bill take effect on the first day of the 13th month beginning after publication, except that all changes that relate to the joint review board take effect on the day after publication.

For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be printed as an appendix to this bill.

The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do enact as follows:

AB731, s. 1 Section 1. 66.46 (2) (f) 4. of the statutes is created to read:

AB731,4,3 66.46 (2) (f) 4. Notwithstanding subd. 1., project costs for a tax incremental district, the authorizing resolution of which contains the findings described in sub. (4) (gm) 4. ac., may not include any expenditures made or estimated to be made or monetary obligations incurred or estimated to be incurred by the city for a residential development or for a retail development, other than incidental retail use in part of a facility that is otherwise used for manufacturing purposes.

AB731, s. 2 Section 2. 66.46 (3m) of the statutes is created to read:

AB731,4,10 66.46 (3m) Limits on tax incremental district boundaries. (a) No city or planning commission may include within the boundary of a tax incremental district territory that has been annexed by the city and that has not been part of the city for at least 3 years before the date on which the city or planning commission includes the territory within the district's boundary if, at the time of the annexation, the city did not intend to include the annexed territory in a tax incremental district.

AB731,4,14 (b) A city or planning commission may include within the boundary of a tax incremental district territory that was annexed by the city, with the intent of the city to include the annexed territory in a tax incremental district, if one of the following conditions applies:

AB731,4,18 1. The city presents evidence to the joint review board under sub. (4m) (d) showing that the city made a good faith effort to enter into a boundary agreement with the town from which the land was annexed before the creation of the district and if the joint review board determines that the city did make such a good faith effort.

AB731,4,21 2. The city pays to the town from which the land was annexed, in 5 equal annual instalments or as otherwise agreed to by the city and the town, an amount that is calculated as follows:

AB731,4,23 a. Determine the current year's net property tax rate of the town from which the land was annexed.

AB731,5,3 b. Multiply the amount under subd. 2. a. by the assessed value of the land that was annexed, as determined from the most recent assessment preceding the year in which the land was annexed.

AB731,5,4 c. Multiply the amount under subd. 2. b. by 5.

AB731, s. 3 Section 3. 66.46 (4) (c) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB731,5,13 66.46 (4) (c) Identification of the specific property to be included under par. (gm) 4., 1995 stats., as blighted or in need of rehabilitation or conservation work. Owners of the property identified shall be notified of the proposed finding and the date of the hearing to be held under par. (e) at least 15 days prior to the date of the hearing. In cities with a redevelopment authority under s. 66.431, the notification required under this paragraph may be provided with the notice required under s. 66.431 (6) (b) 3., if the notice is transmitted at least 15 days prior to the date of the hearing to be held under par. (e).

AB731, s. 4 Section 4. 66.46 (4) (gm) 4. (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB731,5,15 66.46 (4) (gm) 4. (intro.) Contains findings that specify one of the following:

AB731, s. 5 Section 5. 66.46 (4) (gm) 4. a. of the statutes is amended to read:

AB731,5,22 66.46 (4) (gm) 4. a. Not For a district that is created before the effective date of this subd. 4. a. .... [revisor inserts date], that not less than 50%, by area, of the real property within such district is at least one of the following: a blighted area; in need of rehabilitation or conservation work, as defined in s. 66.435 (2m) (b); or suitable for industrial sites within the meaning of s. 66.52 and has been zoned for industrial use; and.

AB731, s. 6 Section 6. 66.46 (4) (gm) 4. ac. of the statutes is created to read:

AB731,6,3 66.46 (4) (gm) 4. ac. That not less than 50%, by area, of the real property within such district is unimproved or was acquired from a town by a city with the intent of creating a tax incremental district which contains that territory.

AB731, s. 7 Section 7. 66.46 (4) (gm) 4. ag. of the statutes is created to read:

AB731,6,10 66.46 (4) (gm) 4. ag. That in at least 2 of the 3 years preceding the year in which the proposed district is to be created the assessed value of the taxable property located in the proposed district declined compared to the assessed value of all of the taxable property in the city. The comparison of assessed value under this subd. 4. ag. shall be made without considering the loss of value, if any, to property acquired by the city in which the proposed district is located.

AB731, s. 8 Section 8. 66.46 (4) (gm) 4. am. of the statutes is created to read:

AB731,6,18 66.46 (4) (gm) 4. am. That in at least 2 of the 3 years preceding the year in which the proposed district is to be created the assessed value of the taxable property located in the proposed district has increased in value at a rate that is lower than the rate of increase of the assessed value of all of the taxable property in the city. The comparison of the rate of increase of assessed value under this subd. 4. am. shall be made without considering the loss of value, if any, to property acquired by the city in which the proposed district is located.

AB731, s. 9 Section 9. 66.46 (4) (gm) 4. b. of the statutes is renumbered 66.46 (4) (gm) 6. and amended to read:

AB731,6,24 66.46 (4) (gm) 6. The Confirms that the improvement of such an area described under subd. 4. ac. is likely to enhance significantly the value of substantially all of the other real property in such the district. It shall not be necessary to identify the specific parcels meeting such criteria; and.

AB731, s. 10 Section 10. 66.46 (4) (gm) 4. bm. of the statutes is renumbered 66.46 (4) (gm) 7. and amended to read:

AB731,7,6 66.46 (4) (gm) 7. The Confirms that the project costs relate directly to eliminating blight, directly serve to rehabilitate or conserve the area or directly serve to promote industrial development, consistent with the purpose for which the tax incremental district is created under subd. 4. a.; and

AB731, s. 11 Section 11. 66.46 (4) (gm) 4. c. of the statutes is renumbered 66.46 (4) (gm) 8. and amended to read:

AB731,7,13 66.46 (4) (gm) 8. Either Confirms that either the equalized value of taxable property of the district plus all existing districts does not exceed 7% of the total equalized value of taxable property within the city or the equalized value of taxable property of the district plus the value increment of all existing districts within the city does not exceed 5% of the total equalized value of taxable property within the city.

AB731, s. 12 Section 12. 66.46 (4) (h) 1. of the statutes is amended to read:

AB731,8,5 66.46 (4) (h) 1. Subject to subd. subds. 2. and 3., the planning commission may at any time, by resolution, adopt an amendment to a project plan, which amendment shall be subject to approval by the local legislative body and approval of the amendment shall require the same findings as provided in par. (g). Any amendment to a project plan is also subject to review by a joint review board, acting under sub. (4m). Adoption of an amendment to a project plan shall be preceded by a public hearing held by the plan commission at which interested parties shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity to express their views on the amendment. Notice of the hearing shall be published as a class 2 notice, under ch. 985. The notice shall include a statement of the purpose and cost of the amendment and shall advise that a copy of the amendment will be provided on request. Prior to such publication, a copy of the notice shall be sent by 1st class mail to the chief executive officer or administrator of all local governmental entities having the power to levy taxes on property within the district and to the school board of any school district which includes property located within the proposed district. For any county with no chief executive officer or administrator, this notice shall be sent to the county board chairperson.

AB731, s. 13 Section 13. 66.46 (4) (h) 2. of the statutes is amended to read:

AB731,8,15 66.46 (4) (h) 2. Not more than once during the 7 years after the tax incremental district is created, and subject to sub. (3m), the planning commission may adopt an amendment to a project plan under subd. 1. to modify the district's boundaries by adding territory to the district that is contiguous to the district and that is served by public works or improvements that were created as part of the district's project plan. Expenditures for project costs that are incurred because of an amendment to a project plan to which this subdivision applies may be made for not more than 3 years after the date on which the local legislative body adopts a resolution amending the project plan.

AB731, s. 14 Section 14. 66.46 (4) (h) 3. of the statutes is created to read:

AB731,8,21 66.46 (4) (h) 3. The planning commission may adopt an amendment to a project plan under subd. 1. to modify the district's boundaries by removing territory from the district if the planning commission issues a written determination that all of the district's project costs which have been, or may be, incurred will be paid for by tax increments that are generated from the smaller district.

AB731, s. 15 Section 15. 66.46 (4m) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB731,9,25 66.46 (4m) (a) Any city that seeks to create a tax incremental district or amend a project plan shall convene a joint review board to review the proposal. The board shall consist of one representative chosen by the school district that has power to levy taxes on the property within the tax incremental district, one representative chosen by the technical college district that has power to levy taxes on the property within the tax incremental district, one representative chosen by the county that has power to levy taxes on the property within the tax incremental district, one representative chosen by the city and one public member. If more than one school district, more than one technical college district or more than one county has the power to levy taxes on the property within the tax incremental district, the unit in which is located property of the tax incremental district that has the greatest value shall choose that representative to the board. The public member and the board's chairperson shall be selected by a majority of the other board members before the public hearing under sub. (4) (a) or (h) 1. is held. All board members shall be appointed and the first board meeting held within 14 days after the notice is published under sub. (4) (a) or (h) 1. The board shall meet at least annually to review the developments occurring in each tax incremental district in the city. Additional meetings of the board shall be held upon the call of any member. Notices of all joint review board meetings that are held after the first meeting shall be sent by the board's chair to all of the other board members, the chief executive officer or administrator of all local governmental entities that have the power to levy taxes on property located within the district and the town board chair of each town from which property was annexed by a city if the property is located within the district and if the town is receiving a payment described under sub. (3m) (b) 2. If the board determines that a city has made expenditures from the special fund described under sub. (6) (c) for purposes other than the purposes that are authorized under sub. (6) (c), the city shall reimburse the special fund, from sources other than tax increments, in the amount of the improper expenditure not later than 2 years after the board makes such a determination. The city that seeks to create the tax incremental district or to amend its project plan shall provide administrative support for the board. By majority vote, the board may disband following approval or rejection of the proposal and shall provide the board, before its annual meeting, with records of each district's expenditures during the most recently concluded fiscal year and the tax increment allocations received by each district in the most recently concluded fiscal year. If the department of revenue sends informational materials or instructions to a joint review board that explain the board's duties and responsibilities, the department shall include instructions on the board's duties when the board conducts it's annual review of the developments occurring in each tax incremental district in the city.

AB731, s. 16 Section 16. 66.46 (4m) (d) of the statutes is created to read:

AB731,10,17 66.46 (4m) (d) Not later than 21 days after receiving from the city the evidence described in sub. (3m) (b) 1., the joint review board shall determine whether the city made a good faith effort to enter into a boundary agreement with the town from which the land was annexed before the creation of the district. The joint review board shall submit its decision to the city and to the town no later than 7 days after the board makes its determination.

AB731, s. 17 Section 17. 66.46 (5) (cg) of the statutes is created to read:

AB731,11,3 66.46 (5) (cg) If the city adopts an amendment to which sub. (4) (h) 3. applies, the tax incremental base for the district shall be redetermined by subtracting from the tax incremental base the assessed value of the taxable property that is deleted from the existing district under sub. (4) (h) 3., as of the January 1 next preceding the effective date of the amendment if the amendment becomes effective between January 2 and September 30, as of the next subsequent January 1 if the amendment becomes effective between October 1 and December 31, and, if the effective date of the amendment is January 1 of any year, as of that date. The tax incremental base, as redetermined under this paragraph, is effective for the purposes of this section only if it is less than the original tax incremental base determined under par. (b).

AB731, s. 18 Section 18. 66.46 (6) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB731,12,11 66.46 (6) (a) If the joint review board approves the creation of the tax incremental district under sub. (4m), positive tax increments with respect to a tax incremental district are allocated to the city which created the district for each year commencing after the date when a project plan is adopted under sub. (4) (g). The department of revenue shall not authorize allocation of tax increments until it determines from timely evidence submitted by the city that each of the procedures and documents required under sub. (4) (d) to (f) have been completed and all related notices given in a timely manner. The department of revenue may authorize allocation of tax increments for any tax incremental district only if the city clerk and assessor annually submit to the department all required information on or before the 2nd Monday in June. The facts supporting any document adopted or action taken to comply with sub. (4) (d) to (f) shall not be subject to review by the department of revenue under this paragraph. Thereafter, the department of revenue shall annually authorize allocation of the tax increment to the city that created such a district until the department of revenue receives a notice under sub. (8) and the notice has taken effect under sub. (8) (b), 27 years after the tax incremental district is created if the district is created before October 1, 1995, or; 23 years after the tax incremental district is created if the district is created after September 30, 1995, and if the authorizing resolution of such a district contains the findings described in sub. (4) (gm) 4. a.; 20 years after the tax incremental district is created if the district is created on or after the effective date of this paragraph .... [revisor inserts date], and if the authorizing resolution of such a district contains the findings described in sub. (4) (gm) 4. ag. or am., except that, if soil within such a district is affected by environmental pollution to the extent that development has not been able to proceed according to the project plan because of the environmental pollution, 23 years after the district is created; 18 years after the tax incremental district is created if the district is created on or after the effective date of this paragraph .... [revisor inserts date], and if the authorizing resolution of such a district contains the findings described in sub. (4) (gm) 4. ac., except that, if soil within such a district is affected by environmental pollution to the extent that development has not been able to proceed according to the project plan because of the environmental pollution, 23 years after the district is created; whichever is sooner.

AB731, s. 19 Section 19. 66.46 (6) (am) 1. of the statutes, as affected by 1997 Wisconsin Act 27, is amended to read:

AB731,12,21 66.46 (6) (am) 1. For Except as provided in subd. 5., for a tax incremental district that is created after September 30, 1995, no expenditure may be made later than 7 years after the tax incremental district is created, and for a tax incremental district that is created before October 1, 1995, no expenditure may be made later than 10 years after the tax incremental district is created, except that, for a tax incremental district that is created before October 1, 1995, and which receives tax increments under par. (d), no expenditure may be made later than 12 years after the tax incremental district is created.

AB731, s. 20 Section 20. 66.46 (6) (am) 5. of the statutes is created to read:

AB731,13,6 66.46 (6) (am) 5. For a tax incremental district that is created after the effective date of this subdivision .... [revisor inserts date], and except as provided in subd. 1., if expenditures equal to at least 60% of the district's estimated project costs are made not later than 9 years after the creation of a tax incremental district, the authorizing resolution of which is described in sub. (4) (gm) 4. ac., or not later than 10 years after the creation of a tax incremental district, the authorizing resolution of which is described in sub. (4) (gm) 4. ag. or am., expenditures equal to the remaining amount of estimated project costs may be made not later than 3 years before the date on which the district is required to terminate under sub. (7).

AB731, s. 21 Section 21. 66.46 (7) (am) of the statutes is amended to read:

AB731,13,15 66.46 (7) (am) Sixteen For a district, the authorizing resolution of which is described under sub. (4) (gm) 4. a., 16 years after the last expenditure identified in the project plan is made if the district to which the plan relates is created after September 30, 1995, or 20 years after the last expenditure identified in the project plan is made if the district to which the plan relates is created before October 1, 1995, except that in no case may the total number of years during which expenditures are made under par. (am) 1. plus the total number of years during which tax increments are allocated under this paragraph exceed 27 years.

AB731, s. 22 Section 22. 66.46 (7) (ar) of the statutes is created to read:

AB731,13,25 66.46 (7) (ar) 1. For a district, the authorizing resolution of which is described under sub. (4) (gm) 4. ac., 11 years after the last expenditure identified in the project plan is made, or 16 years after the last expenditure identified in the project plan is made if soil within such a district is affected by environmental pollution to the extent that development has not been able to proceed according to the project plan because of the environmental pollution, except that in no case may the total number of years during which expenditures are made under sub. (6) (am) 1. plus the total number of years during which tax increments are allocated under this subdivision exceed 23 years.

AB731,14,8 2. For a district, the authorizing resolution of which is described under sub. (4) (gm) 4. ag. or am., 13 years after the last expenditure identified in the project plan is made, or 16 years after the last expenditure identified in the project plan is made if soil within such a district is affected by environmental pollution to the extent that development has not been able to proceed according to the project plan because of the environmental pollution, except that in no case may the total number of years during which expenditures are made under sub. (6) (am) 1. plus the total number of years during which tax increments are allocated under this subdivision exceed 23 years.

AB731, s. 23 Section 23. Effective dates. This act takes effect on the first day of the 13th month beginning after publication, except as follows:

AB731,14,12 (1) The treatment of section 66.46 (4m) (a) of the statutes takes effect on the day after publication.

AB731,14,13 (End)